Vietnamese Court upholds sentence against three young Catholics
Hanoi (AsiaNews / Agencies) - A Vietnamese court has upheld the sentence on
appeal, handed down at first instance in May, against three young Catholic
activists, guilty - according to the Communist authorities - for
"propaganda against the state" and distributing "anti-government
leaflets." The
hearing was held on September 26 at the Nghe An province People's Court, in the
north of the country. In recent weeks even the Vinh diocese' Commission for Justice
and Peace had campaigned for their release, appealing for an appeal "in accordance
with international law" and their subsequent release "because they
are innocent people."
The
court upheld the initial sentence for Antonie Dau Van Duong and Pierre Tran Huu Duc. The sentence of the third Catholic, Chu Manh Son, was instead
reduced to six months. The
fourth defendant, however, preferred not to appeal, for fear of an even harsher
punishment being meeted out. The
Catholics of the diocese of Vinh tried to gain access to the court, but a heavy
deployment of police and the lack of transportation hindered the faithful. Unconfirmed
reports speak of five or six people arrested.
To
date, only four out of 17 Christian activists, who were arrested by the police
in June 2011, have undergone trial. The
first trial was held May 25 in
Nghe An province people's court (see AsiaNews 25/05/2012 Four
Catholic activists, on trial for "propaganda against the state", are
sentenced "). In
accordance with Articles 88 and 79 of the Penal Code, the judges issued a
sentence of 42 months in prison, plus 18 months probation for Antonie Dau Van
Duong, 39 months in prison and one year of probation to Tran Huu Duc; 36
months and one year of probation to Chu Manh Son, and finally Hoang Phong, was sentenced
to 18 months.
For
Catholic leaders, the first trial was a "sham" in which civil rights enshrined
in the Constitution were violated: freedom of speech, press, assembly and information.
The
young people were only expressing personal opinions and could - in theory - rely
on the basic human rights. They
are "good students" and come from "poor and hard-working"
families.
23/09/2016 09:25