Do not allow the violence to kill the heart of Lebanon
Beirut (AsiaNews) - Protests and violence were reported in
Beirut and other cities, after the attack on Ashrafieh on 19 October that
killed Lebanese intelligence chief, Gen. Wissam
al-Hasan. Last
night there were clashes in west Beirut and in the southern suburbs. Opposition
groups demonstrated at 8pm, immediately after the funeral, demanding the
resignation of Prime Minister Najib Mikati, considered too close to Syria,
because there are pro-Syrian Christians and Hezbollah members in his government.
The
most widespread opinion is that Syria is behind the attack on al-Hasan, even
though the Lebanese security services are ruling nothing out (including an
Israeli or Salafi track, as al-Hasan had destroyed their spy networks) .
Yesterday
the United States offered to work with the Lebanese investigators to find those
responsible for the attack. Mikati
has offered his resignation, but President Michel Suleiman has not accepted it to
avoid a power vacuum in such a tense situation.
At the
funeral of al-Hasan were his widow and two children. The
general was buried in Martyrs' Square, next to Rafic Hariri, the Prime Minister
killed in an attack-bomb in 2005. Al-Hasan's
investigations had led to a clear implication of Damascus in the assassination.
Al-Hasan's
murder has heightened the risk of further division in the country. The
President, speaking at the slain General's funeral, said that the government
and people have to work "shoulder to shoulder" to overcome the
challenges created by the murder. Even
Saad Hariri, leader of the opposition, who took refuge abroad for security
reasons, has asked his supporters to demonstrate, but without violence. Save
Lebanon from the spiral of violence that is likely to involve the entire Middle
East is the urgent task which drives Fady Noun, a great Lebanese journalist, in
this analysis.
Of all the reactions to the Achrafieh attack, the most admirable is that of a
woman hospitalized in Hotel-Dieu hospital, given to LBC: she said that at the
time of the explosion that she was praying for the Syrian people, and said,
"What wrong
have these people done to justify such desolation?".
Exactly. What
wrong did this people do to justify such suffering?
The
words of a Syrian worker on a construction site were also admirable: "See,
today we are paying the price of all the violence done to Lebanon."
In
this double generosity of the heart is the key to peace in Lebanon - and why
not, even that of Syria. The
forgiveness offered by this woman of the people, whose leaders inflict such
suffering is the key for an end to violence in Lebanon.
Walid Jumblatt said
as much in his own way. It
is with politics, the art of the common good and the possible, a noble and
pragmatic art, that we must respond to the attack in Achrafieh.
"Let
us not fall into the game of the instigators of the attack," warned Michel
Sleiman, who fears an internal strife. They are
wise words that bring some light into our dark night. The
night of those on television, drunk with grief, who say that their suffering
will only be met on the day when they will see the corpse of Bashar al-Assad
trampled by his people, recognizable but almost destroyed, as was the case with
Wissam al-Hasan, who rescuers only recognized by the wristwatch he wore and a
fragment of his weapon.
That's not how you
stop the violence. Is
not that what Ghassan Tueni said at the burial of his son, who was assassinated
in 2005. Ghassan
Tueni said: "We must end revenge. Take in the violence we have received and
learn to hope that it will be the last. Learn not to take revenge, learn that
violence leads to more violence and that in the vicious circle, we can become
prisoners of violence, perpetrating
it and ending up looking like our opponent, so that nothing distinguishes us
from our enemy. "
Stop
the violence by responding to it with civility. Allow
me to mention here to quote Michel Eddé's funeral eulogy of Ghassan Tueni, when
he said that "the only lasting revolutions are white revolutions"
that violence as an engine of historical change is a lost ideology.
In his book "Journey into
violence," Samir Frangié cites René Girard, trying to show that there is a
more atavistic violence in our violence, and that the only way of taking charge
of it is by accepting it as part of us.
Yes, the assassin is in each of us and the journey to the heart of the
violence is a journey into ourselves. Just
like the injured woman at the Hotel-Dieu, whose heart has over taken ideologies,
like Ghassan Tueni, like the advise of those wise men and women still among us:
we can redeem this violence that has targeted us by responding with a civilized
behavior.
This
does not mean being blind to the origin of the attack or its authors. The
murderers are among us, as well as beyond our borders. But
it means mastering the art that can stop the violence, preventing it from
destroying us from within, after having destroying all those outside. We
must first defeat our own violence if we want to defeat the violence of our
enemy. We
can and must show the world in a peaceful manner, as we have done so many
times, that Lebanon really exists.